What government can routinely do
Standing Technical Informational Capability
Digital government can acquire powers that no single agency was ever given. Fiduciary Commons asks what government may legitimately know, what it actually needs to know, and how systems can make unnecessary informational power unavailable rather than merely unused.
A government may comply with many separate rules and still possess a capability that no law, purpose, or necessity justifies. The constitutional question is not only whether an official accessed information. It is whether government built a standing power to know that exceeds legitimate authority.
STIC <= NSIC <= SLIA
Standing Technical Informational Capability
Necessary Standing Informational Capability
Standing Legitimate Informational Authority
Legal authority sets a boundary. It does not instruct government to build every capability that could fit within that boundary.

Facts are not property merely because they concern a person.
Possession does not create authority.
Technical capability does not create authority.
Commercial availability does not create governmental authority.
Interoperability does not aggregate governmental authority.
Government should receive the Authorized Answer, not automatically the underlying informational environment.
Verify without unnecessary observation.
Return the proposition, not the informational environment.
Check a condition without building a history.
Computation creates no new governmental authority.